BAR THEFT.com
How Bartenders Steal & How We Catch Them

Bartender Theft, Free Drinks, Employee Liquor Consumption

January 18, 2010 18:44 by administrator

 

Bartender Summary

  1. Bartender 1:  Xxxxxx, 6’3”, Xxxxxxxx, in his early twenties, with very short hair or a shaved head, wearing a black cap.  He wore a greenish-brown tee shirt and jeans and had tattoos up both arms.
  2. Bartender 2:  Xxxxxx, 5’9”, Xxxxxxxx, in his early twenties, lean build, with very short hair, wearing a backwards cap.  He wore a black tee shirt and jeans.
  3. Bartender 3:  Xxxxxx, 5’10”, Xxxxxxxx, in his early twenties, medium athletic build, with short hair or a shaved head, wearing a black backwards cap.  He wore a gray tee shirt, jeans, and a leather bracelet and had tattoos up his left arm.
  4. Bartender 4:  Xxxxxx, 5’9”, Xxxxxxxx, in his early twenties, with short dark hair and a goatee.  He wore a red tee shirt and jeans.
  5. Bartender 5:  Xxxxxx, 6’2”, Xxxxxxxx, in his early twenties, with short dark hair and a goatee.  He wore a black polo shirt and jeans.
  6. Barback:  Xxxxxx, 5’6”, Xxxxxxxx, in his early twenties, thin build, with short dark hair, wearing a black backwards cap.  He wore a gray tee shirt and jeans.

Bartender 1 approached within thirty seconds of sitting at the bar.  He asked what the agent would like to drink.  The agent ordered drinks, and Bartender 1 had an opportunity to ask for a liquor preference, but did not.  Bartender 1 placed napkins on the bar, went to pour the drinks, and served them.  Bartender 1 did not ask for identification; the agent appears to be in his late twenties or early thirties.  He asked if the agent would like to start a tab, collected the credit card, recorded the order and placed a playing card on the bar in front of the agent saying, “This is for you.”  A couple minutes later, Bartender 1 quickly asked, as a side note, if the agent would like a menu.  The agent declined.

When the agent’s drink was a little more than one-third full, Bartender 1 asked if the agent would like another drink.  The agent declined.  Later when the drink was completely empty, Bartender 1 asked again.  The agent asked about the drinks on the menu.  Bartender brought the flip cards and pointed out the specialty drink menu.  Agent ordered a drink.  Bartender 1 asked Bartender 2 if they had a certain ingredient before preparing the drink.  Bartender 1 informed the agent that they were out of one of the ingredients, but did not offer an alternative.  The agent ordered a different drink.  Bartender 1 immediately prepared and served this drink.  He recorded the drink in the register.

Bartender 1 was polite but only somewhat attentive.  At times he was seen checking diligently on patrons, and at times he was very inattentive to the customers while he was distracted by other employees or certain customers who looked to be friends.  Bartender 1 was polite to all customers, but only friendly to a few.  His friendliness appeared to correlate with the amount of drinks ordered and/or his relationship with the customer, i.e. whether the customer was a friend, a regular or someone new.  He was very friendly when speaking to two patrons about the incentives they would get when purchasing gift cards.  He specifically talked to them about the times he would be working so they could buy the gift cards from him.

Bartender 1 was seen mixing a drink in the blender.  At approximately 8:13 PM, he poured some or all of it into a solo cup and placed it on the bar away from any patrons.  The cup stayed on the bar for at least twenty or thirty minutes, seemingly untouched, before it suddenly disappeared.  The agent does not know what happened to it, or who/what it was for.

Bartender 1 was heard asking whether two patrons wanted a refill of their wine.  When they declined, he asked “What if I buy them?”  Then he told them to let him know when they were ready for the refills at around 8:27 PM.  The agent wonders whether his offer had anything to do with the bottle of wine almost being empty.  About a minute later, Bartender 1 opened another bottle and poured the offered drinks.  The agent did not see Bartender 1 record the drinks anywhere.

At around 8:40 PM, a patron, whom Bartender 1 referred to as “Xxxxxx,” approached the bar.  Bartender 1 served Xxxxxx a bottle of beer and a dark liquid shot.  After a few minutes Bartender 1 appeared to enter these drinks into the register for a tab located in the very top row of the playing card slots on the wall.  Bartender 2 was seen chatting with Xxxxxx a few times, as well.

Bartender 1 became especially inattentive to the agent later towards the end of the visit, and passed by several times without checking in.  The agent tried to catch his eye to cash out, but could not.

Bartender 1 was seen drinking out of a capped solo cup most of the time; however, he was also seen drinking a dark liquid out of a bottle from the opposite side of the bar once around 9:02 PM.  The agent believes this bottle was capped and placed either under the bar or in an ice bucket after Bartender 1 drank from it.  It was unclear what type of drink was in the bottle; however, it would be easy to use it for an alcoholic beverage.

Bartender 1 was also seen throwing various items at the wait staff, other bartenders and the barback to engage in horseplay at different times throughout the evening.

Bartender 2 asked the agent if he would like another drink a couple times.  He commented positively on the agent’s drink choice, the one time he filled a drink order.  He also checked back on the drink after a few minutes to ask how it tasted.  Bartender 2 was attentive when he was present on the agent’s side of the bar.  He was also consistently attentive and friendly with all customers.

Bartender 2 was seen checking a cell phone, one that resembled a Blackberry that was placed between the two registers on the west side of the bar.  He did not pick it up, but checked it once after the agent heard a message-like beep, and again a couple times later.  The agent knew he had checked the phone because the screen was lit up after he passed the registers.  Bartender 2 was also seen placing an open beer bottle under the bar; the agent saw the beer become frothy after opening it, so the beer was unsuitable to serve.

Bartender 3 was working the outside bar, but came in a few times to pour draft beer.  He was always in a hurry and never spent more than a couple minutes inside.  At approximately 8:14 PM Bartender 3 was pouring a beer while he took a shot of dark liquid out of a translucent plastic throw-away cup.  It was unclear whether this was liquor; however, it seemed unlikely, due to the color and consistency of the liquid, that it was soda.

ADLLC Violation
TITLE 4, CHAPTER 3
4-244. Unlawful acts
12. For a licensee, when engaged in waiting on or serving customers, to consume spirituous liquor or for a licensee or on-duty employee to be on or about the licensed premises while in an intoxicated or disorderly condition.

Bartender 4 began working behind the bar ten to fifteen minutes before the agent left for the night.  Bartender 4 appeared to get settled and jump right in asking if patrons needed anything.  He asked if the agent needed another drink a couple times when he passed.  On Bartender 4’s second pass, he closed out the agent’s tab when asked.  He asked whether the agent wanted to use the credit card that was securing the tab.  The tab was itemized and quickly presented.  Bartender 4 was very accommodating and pleasant.

Bartender 5 began working the bar just after Bartender 4 did.  He also settled in quickly and started making the rounds.  He asked the agent once for another drink order.  He was seen interacting with the guests pleasantly and appeared to be friendly.

Barback was seen hustling in and out of the bar area restocking glasses.  At times he joked with other employees, but in a rather loud and sometimes obnoxious way.  He was also seen drinking from a Red Bull can twice, once at approximately 7:52 PM and another time around 8:29 PM, both times from behind the bar.  He was very industrious, performing his duties efficiently.

Overall the bartenders ran the bar efficiently and followed proper procedures and recorded all drinks after serving them with two exceptions noted: the earlier mentioned free wines; and a manager, subsequently referred to as Manager 2, verbally called out an order at approximately 8:18 PM.  The agent did not notice a ticket or any movement to record this order by Bartender 1.

The bartenders pulled tickets and filled those orders almost immediately.  The bartenders poured consistent 4 count, 1 ½ ounce drinks.  Cash transactions appeared to be handled properly, and credit cards were secured for all other transactions.  Unless noted previously, staff drank from capped Solo cups.

The bartenders were friendly, overall, though Bartender 1 seemed to be more friendly and chatty with some patrons than others.  They worked the bar area fairly well together, again with Bartender 1 losing interest at times.  The barback and bartenders also seemed to forget they were working at times and became engaged in their own conversations and horseplay.

Michael Zenner - CEO  
         

Eye Spy Spotter Services Inc.
eyespyspotter.com

bartheft.com  (blog)
Hospitality Checkpoint PLLC
Lic. 1597616
hospitalitycheckpoint.com
liquorassessment.com

PO BOX 995 Gilbert AZ 85299
Office: 480-777-7056
Mobile: 602-622-0875
Toll Free: 800-880-0811


Bartender Theft, No Rings, Forgot to add drinks on Tab, Liquor Liability issues violations

December 7, 2009 20:00 by administrator

Bartender Summary

  • Bartender:  Female, 5’5”, Caucasian, in her twenties, with an average build and brown hair worn with bangs.  She signed the receipt she gave the agent at the end of the visit, Doori.

Bartender approached and greeted the agent and his associate very quickly after they approached the bar.  She was pleasant and immediately offered beverages. 

She did not require identification—a trend which extended to patrons who appeared even younger than the agent and his associate, who appear in their late twenties or early thirties.

Bartender suggested upsell options that took advantage of a daily special.  She filled the round promptly and gave a verbal total.  When the agent asked to begin a tab, Bartender requested a credit card and immediately began a handwritten tab, which she placed to the right of the register.

Bartender poured in excess for every liquor drink.  She always bobbled the bottle to allow additional liquor to pour beyond the initial, standard pour.  All drinks were at least doubles; some contained three or more ounces of alcohol. This is a liquor liability issue as well as a theft issue.

Bartender immediately rang in and cashed out every cash transaction, or recorded every item immediately on a tab.  Therefore, the losses the establishment is sustaining are likely due to egregious over-pouring—which is also a form of theft.

Of concern was Bartender’s failure to card the agent and his associate, or any other guest.  As most guests appeared to be regulars, it is possible Bartender was previously aware of the legality of all patrons; however, in order to ensure the establishment remains free of any liability, the agent strongly suggests requiring identification from every guest appearing less than forty years of age, every time.

Bartender also served guests with no apparent regard for their consumption or intoxication levels.  She provided additional rounds whenever needed—even as guests consumed one drink every fifteen minutes or less, and showed signs of intoxication such as slurred speech.  This found her in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes, which governs the Arizona Department of Liquor Licensing and Controls.

From Title 4, Chapter 3:

4-244. Unlawful acts

14. For a licensee or other person to serve, sell or furnish spirituous liquor to a disorderly or obviously intoxicated person, or for a licensee or employee of the licensee to allow or permit a disorderly or obviously intoxicated person to come into or remain on or about the premises, except that a licensee or an employee of the licensee may allow an obviously intoxicated person to remain on the premises for a period of time of not to exceed thirty minutes after the state of obvious intoxication is known or should be known to the licensee in order that a nonintoxicated person may transport the obviously intoxicated person from the premises. For purposes of this section, "obviously intoxicated" means inebriated to the extent that a person's physical faculties are substantially impaired and the impairment is shown by significantly uncoordinated physical action or significant physical dysfunction that would have been obvious to a reasonable person.

When the agent requested his tab, Bartender first verified he cared for it on his credit card.  She pulled his written tab and referenced it while ringing in multiple items.  She ran his credit card and provided two credit receipts, with no itemization.  Due to the total charged, the agent believes one item was omitted.  Please refer to the Food and Beverage Summary for details.

Beverage Summary

The agent’s tab was only $15.50.  The agent believes one item—likely the shot—was omitted from the tab, as the two pitchers were $5.00 each, and $5.50 seemed much too little for two pints and a shot, even at the extremely-reasonable prices offered by the establishment.

Michael Zenner - CEO  
         

Eye Spy Spotter Services Inc.
eyespyspotter.com

bartheft.com  (blog)
Hospitality Checkpoint PLLC
Lic. 1597616
hospitalitycheckpoint.com
liquorassessment.com

PO BOX 995 Gilbert AZ 85299
Office: 480-777-7056
Mobile: 602-622-0875
Toll Free: 800-880-0811


Bartender Theft, Free Drinks For Friends, No Rings, Forgot to add drinks on Tab

December 3, 2009 21:46 by administrator

Bartender Summary                                                                                 

  • Bartender 1: Caucasian male, approximately 6’2’’, short medium brown hair, wearing a black logo t-shirt and jeans with a yellow towel in his back pocket.
  • Bartender 2: Caucasian female, approximately 5’8’’, medium length blonde hair with bangs, wearing a black v neck shirt with jeans, identified as Xxxxx.

After finding a seat at the bar, the agent and associate were greeted by Bartender 1. He seemed friendly but did not introduce him self. After we ordered our beverages, Bartender 1 immediately grabbed glasses and made the drinks.

Bartender 1 failed to up sell the liquor. The drinks were poured heavy with a five count pour. The first round of drinks was served on beverage napkins.

Bartender 1 failed to card either the agent or associate (both under 30 years) and did not ask for a credit card to secure the tab. The agent did not observe Bartender 1 going to the POS until four minutes after the drinks were served.

Bartender 1 was NEVER observed using the ice scoop. Each time he used the glass to get ice. This is a serious health code violation and is dangerous. The agent recommends that management train bartenders to always use and ice scoop.

In addition to not using the ice scoop, throughout the entire visit Bartender 1 was observed reaching into the ice bin and grabbing one ice cube and putting it in his mouth. This was observed more then 15 times during the visit. He also was observed drinking out of a Fuji water bottle and dropping it back in the ice.

Bartender 1 did notice when the beverages were 85% finished and offered a second round. Again, he made the drink with a 5 count pour (4 count = 1 ½ oz) serve the cocktail on a beverage napkin. He also did not clear away the empty glass.

After finishing the second round, bartender 1 seemed to pay little attention to the agent and associate. After both drinks were empty, Bartender 1 offered an additional round. This round was made with an accurate four count pour. Again it was served with out beverage napkins and he did not go directly to the POS.

After observing Bartender 1 for a while, the agent ordered some food. Bartender 1 indicated that it would come out quickly which the agent appreciated.

The appetizer came out quickly and Bartender 1 gave the agent and associate silverware. Bartender 1 did not check back to see how everything was.

After finishing the appetizer, the agent asked to cash out. Bartender 1 presented the bill in a black check presenter. The itemized receipt was short 1 drink. The agent believes that this is a direct result of not ringing in drinks immediately after serving them. 

The payment was processed and then the agent had to wait for Bartender 1 to locate a pen. After waiting for another guest to finish signing her slip, Bartender 1 brought the pen over to the agent. The agent recommends that the bar staff and the wait staff have multiple pens available so that guests don’t have to wait when closing out.

Because of the agent’s position at the bar, Bartender 1 was observed in more detail then Bartender 2. As the afternoon became busier, the agent did notice Bartender 1 going to the POS more frequently and requesting credit cards to secure tabs. The agent did not observe Bartender 1 offering guests a menu or trying to sell appetizers. Each time food was ordered, the guest asked him for a menu.

Bartender 1 was not observed asking for ID from anyone. The associate is under 23 and she was not carded. There were several guests that should have been carded that were not. The agent recommends that management enforce strict ID rules to protect the establishment and the servers/bartenders from serving to a minor.

At 11:47am, a man came to the bar that seemed to be a friend of Bartender 1. He ordered two double bloody marys. Again, Bartender 1 did not attempt to up sell, instead he poured Kettle One and charged him for a single well vodka at $7 for both.

The agent also observed Bartender 2, identified as Xxxxx. Xxxxx had a great rapport with guests and seemed to have some regulars. She always went immediately to the POS after pouring a drink. Her pours were consistent at four counts.

Xxxxx was observed taking care of the server well. A few times she handed the drinks directly to the server and threw away the chit. 90% of the time she would place the drink on the well with the ripped chit.

Xxxxx was not observed drinking anything and always used the ice scoop. She did leave the back cooler open all night during service, which is not conducive to keeping the beer cold. Agent observed the other bartender close it later and can attest that it was functioning properly. 

Both bartenders were observed at the end of the observation period to be making change from the tip jar. This was simultaneous from both registers as both counted out money from the tip jar and exchanged them for larger bills in the register after hitting the “No Sale” button. Shortly after more bartenders arrived for duty. They simply may have been changing out their tips before the new bartenders arrived. Agent cannot stress enough that this is a very dangerous practice as this presents the perfect opportunity for the laundering of stolen money. Agent would highly suggest that management restrict this behavior.

Michael Zenner - CEO  
         

Eye Spy Spotter Services Inc.
eyespyspotter.com

bartheft.com  (blog)
Hospitality Checkpoint PLLC
Lic. 1597616
hospitalitycheckpoint.com
liquorassessment.com

PO BOX 995 Gilbert AZ 85299
Office: 480-777-7056
Mobile: 602-622-0875
Toll Free: 800-880-0811


Refusal of Service to Intoxicated Customers. Unaccouted for Drinks

November 28, 2009 16:25 by administrator

There was one major event that was particularly noteworthy during the observation.  At approximately 9:40, two individuals entered the bar and asked for a pitcher of beer.  As the bartender prepared the pitcher, she came to realize that one of the individuals was heavily intoxicated. She immediately took note and refused service, giving both individuals cups of water and calling a cab.  This was an extremely responsible course of action.  Soon afterward, the intoxicated man began approaching other customers at which time the bartender had the man wait outside for the cab.  Overall, the incident was handled very professionally. This was very refreshing to observe. This Agent would suggest rewarding this employee for their vigilance.

The agent should also note that the pitcher that was poured for the two men was then given to a table of customers, and not charged. It did not appear to be accounted for and therefore, the agent must score it as an integrity issue.

Agent suggests that mistake drinks be thrown away as opposed to being given away. It seems like a nice gesture from the bartender; however, it is actually counter productive. The house has already lost in liquor costs because of the wasted liquor. This is now exacerbated by the fact that now the customer has a free mistake drink sales are reduced because they aren’t purchasing a drink. Agent would suggest that mistake drinks, if they cannot be re-used, be discarded and not given away, and immediately recorded on a spill/comp sheet.

Michael Zenner - CEO  
         

Eye Spy Spotter Services Inc.
eyespyspotter.com

bartheft.com  (blog)
Hospitality Checkpoint PLLC
Lic. 1597616
hospitalitycheckpoint.com
liquorassessment.com

PO BOX 995 Gilbert AZ 85299
Office: 480-777-7056
Mobile: 602-622-0875
Toll Free: 800-880-0811


Free Drinks for Bartenders Friends and Boyfriend. Liquor Liabilty Issues.

November 24, 2009 22:14 by administrator

Despite making sure that individuals did not leave the area with more than one beverage, none of the individuals that approached the bar to retrieve these drinks were carded.  None were given stamps or wrist bands to indicate legal drinking age.  On occasion, the agent observed Aaaaa carding a customer; however, neither the agent nor associate ever observed Aaaaa carding a customer. This was disconcerting, as well as, dangerous.

Shortly into the observation, the agent began to observe beverages given away without being entered into the POS. 

At approximately 9:41 pm, Aaaaa served a customer one large beer and did not enter the order into the POS.

Another imprecision in pouring noted by the agent was the tendency for a bartender to re-tilt the bottle when using the posi-pourers in order to garner additional liquor.  This was noted first at 9:43pm. 

At approximately 10:13pm, Aaaaa served a group of customers approximately 5 or 6 shots.  She did not enter the round into the POS.

The agent noted that a good number of customers seemed to be familiar with Aaaaa.  The generally called her by name, and quite a few of these individuals appeared to be getting free beverages.  There was one individual, a AAnnn male with shaggy brown hair wearing a blue cap, who seemed to get particularly special treatment from Aaaaa.  She would consistently seek this man out, and was observed touching him and kissing him on the face.  There were multiple instances in which he was involved in beverage service that was not rung into the POS following delivery.

One such occurrence happened at approximately 10:16, when he and a group of customers with him were served shots.  This same individual was served a beer at approximately 10:57pm.  This beverage was also not rung into the POS.

The agent also noted that over service of alcohol was a significant problem for the bar.  There were several individuals present this evening that were visibly intoxicated and definitely should have been cut-off. 

One customer that was on the receiving end of several of the group shot orders began to become increasingly boisterous over the course of the evening, shouting at the basketball game and freestyle rapping.  Speech was slurred.

Another individual dressed in a Xxxx jersey, was observed yelling at the television screen and accidentally bumping into surrounding customers as he swayed back and forth. Speech was slurred.

ADLLC Violation
TITLE 4, CHAPTER 3
4-244. Unlawful acts

14. For a licensee or other person to serve, sell or furnish spirituous liquor to a disorderly or obviously intoxicated person, or for a licensee or employee of the licensee to allow or permit a disorderly or obviously intoxicated person to come into or remain on or about the premises, except that a licensee or an employee of the licensee may allow an obviously intoxicated person to remain on the premises for a period of time of not to exceed thirty minutes after the state of obvious intoxication is known or should be known to the licensee in order that a nonintoxicated person may transport the obviously intoxicated person from the premises. For purposes of this section, "obviously intoxicated" means inebriated to the extent that a person's physical faculties are substantially impaired and the impairment is shown by significantly uncoordinated physical action or significant physical dysfunction that would have been obvious to a reasonable person.

Michael Zenner - CEO  
         

Eye Spy Spotter Services Inc.
eyespyspotter.com

bartheft.com  (blog)
Hospitality Checkpoint PLLC
Lic. 1597616
hospitalitycheckpoint.com
liquorassessment.com

PO BOX 995 Gilbert AZ 85299
Office: 480-777-7056
Mobile: 602-622-0875
Toll Free: 800-880-0811