BAR THEFT.com
How Bartenders Steal & How We Catch Them
Home

BARTENDER THEFT - Bartender not ringing drinks, intoxicated bartender, employee drug use, liquor violations, heath code violations, smoking law violations.

September 22, 2011 00:31 by administrator

BARTENDER THEFT:

Bartender Summary

  • Bartender 1 – Caucasian male with xxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx wearing xxxxxxxxxxxxxx shirt and xxxxxx with tattoos on xxxxxx.
  • Bartender 2 – Caucasian male with xxxxxx wearing a xxxxxxxxxx down shirt and xxxxxxxxx with black Dickies hanging down below his butt.

Agent and associate took a seat at the bar and were greeted by bartender 2 within 2 minutes.

He approached and spun napkins onto the bar top and asked what we would like to drink.  He did not offer a specialty drink menu so agent asked for one. 

He did not introduce himself or ask if we would like anything to eat.

Bartender 2 set about making the drinks we ordered right away and returned with them placing them on the cocktail napkins and chatting with us for a moment before moving down the bar to speak to another guest.  Bartender 2 made no move to the POS, did not quote us a price and did not request a credit card for a tab.  There was an issue with one of the drinks. (Please see food and beverage summary for details.)

Later in the evaluation associates drink was completely empty for nearly 5 minutes before bartender 2 approached and asked about another.  While he made the drink he was quite engrossed in a conversation with another bar guest and remained so when he dropped off the drink.  He did not take the empty away and made no move to the POS to record the drink.

Agent observed bartender 2 rolling a beer bottle on top of a cooler behind the bar and when the guest asked why he was doing this, the bartender went into detail about how it breaks up the sediment from the bottom of the bottle, but then when he opened the beer right after rolling it, a large amount of it foamed over onto the top of the cooler.  Agent thought it was a nice touch to roll the guests beer, but felt it was a bit odd that he allowed it to spill on the top of the cooler and neglected to clean it up.

Agent and associate had nearly no dealing with bartender 1 during the evaluation; however agent noted from afar that bartender 1 was quite stone faced.  He did not smile, introduce himself, or offer any pleasant welcoming behavior to any of the guests he was observed dealing with.  He was quite sarcastic which a few of the guests found amusing, but agent felt he could have attempted to be much friendlier.

For quite a while bartender 1 was observed sitting on a foot stool behind the bar doing something in one of the coolers which agent surmised was possibly taking inventory or cleaning.  For another large portion of the evaluation the bartender 1 was gone from behind the bar leaving bartender 2 to handle the bar top on his own which was not too busy for a single bartender at the time.

Agent observed bartender 1 pour Don Julio into a large snifter which he had laying on its side apparently to measure the pour.  Agent estimated that there was 4 – 5 ounces of tequila in the snifter when the pour was complete and agent does not believe that the guest ordered a double; regardless it was more accurately a quadruple. Bartender 1 did move right to the POS after serving the drink.

This is also an ADLLC Violation and a dram shop issue that management should address.

TITLE 4, CHAPTER 3

4-244. Unlawful acts

23. For an on-sale retailer or employee to conduct drinking contests, to sell or deliver to a person an unlimited number of spirituous liquor beverages during any set period of time for a fixed price, to deliver more than thirty-two ounces of beer, one liter of wine or four ounces of distilled spirits in any spirituous liquor drink to one person at one time for that person's consumption or to advertise any practice prohibited by this paragraph.

Agent noted that there were no tab chits in front of any guest during the evaluation and no guests were observed paying cash as they went either.

Agent observed bartender 2 pour two 6 count shots of Sambucca into small rocks glasses, hand one to the guest and keep one for himself, toast the guest and drink the alcohol while standing behind the bar.  He then continued talking to the guest and made no move to the POS to record; which is obviously an ADLLC Violation, not to mention a theft occurrence.

TITLE 4, CHAPTER 3

4-244. Unlawful acts

12. For a licensee, when engaged in waiting on or serving customers, to consume spirituous liquor or for a licensee or on-duty employee to be on or about the licensed premises while in an intoxicated or disorderly condition.

Agent observed bartender 1 serve three 4 count pour shots of wild turkey to 3 bar guests while one of the guests appeared to be objecting and afterward, replace the bottle to its shelf, but make no move to the POS.

There were three occasions that agent observed bartender 2 or the server attempting to deliver guests food, but bartender 2 had put the wrong item into the system which is more evidence to agent’s suspicion that the bartender was not sober (see addendum). He incorrectly ordered xxxxx, xxxxxxxxxx and a xxxxxxxx dessert which ended up being offered to and eaten by other guests for free.  Not only was this a profit loss, but it meant the guest that ordered food had to wait even longer for their food to be prepared, and ones that were going to order food didn’t because they got free food.

Bartender 2 was observed serving numerous drinks during the evaluation and there were only 5 times that agent observed him approaching the POS.  When he did approach the POS he did not even look around as if he was attempting to remember what he had served to enter it in all at once.  Agent estimates that bartender 2 served 10-15 drinks that were not accounted for in the POS.

Other than the 3 aforementioned shots of Wild Turkey, the few drinks that agent observed bartender 1 serve appeared to be entered into the POS.

There were occasions during the evaluation that agent noted glassware not being removed from in front of guests when they received new beverages and also the top of the dishwasher and both sides of the service well located at the end of the bar were covered with dirty dishes.  Agent understands that it is important for bartenders to spend time engaging with guests, but it is equally important not to let things become unsightly or unhealthy.

During the evaluation agent observed 3 men smoking cigarettes at the bar and neither of the bartenders appeared to be concerned in the least about the issue at all.  In fact, bartender 2 was observed lighting one of the men’s cigarettes with a match for him.  The men were at the bar for some time and they all had more than one cigarette.  Not only is this a violation of the AZ Smoke Free Act, but it is disrespectful to other guests.  Agent and associate were certainly not asked if we minded and neither were any of the other guests at the bar.  Agent was appalled that the bartenders would allow such behavior and totally disregard the law and the feelings of the other guests in the establishment.

36-601.01. Smoke-free Arizona act

As defined by the law, all violating proprietors are subject to be fined up to $500 for each offense.

B. Smoking is prohibited in all public places and places of employment within the state of Arizona

I. An owner, manager, operator or employee of place regulated by this law shall inform any person who is smoking in violation of this law that smoking is illegal and request that the illegal smoking stop immediately.

K. A person who smokes where smoking is prohibited is guilty of a petty offense with a fine of not less than fifty dollars and not more than three hundred dollars.

When agent and associate were ready to tab out bartender 1 was away from the bar and had been for 15 minutes or so and bartender 2 was chatting with a guest.  It took 10 minutes for agent and associate to get bartender 2 attention to get our tab so we could close out.

Addendum:

Food and Beverage Summary

DO NOT POST THIS SECTION TO STAFF

SPOTTER ANONYMITY WILL BE COMPROMISED

We chose a seat at a booth on the left side of the establishment from the entrance.

The specialty cocktails ordered were:

xxxxxxxxxxx which was served with a lime wedge in a stemmed water glass, tasted good, but the ginger beer was a bit flat.

Old Fashioned which was served in a rocks glass and garnished with a black cherry in the center of an orange twist.  The drink was very good and a bit different than the typical old fashioned, but was a nice twist.

xxxxxxxx was served in a martini glass with grenadine pooled in the bottom.  The drink was fruity and very cold and was quite good.

xxxxxx which was served on the rocks with a lime wedge.  The Daiquiri was quite different than expected which agent believes was from the Maraschino Liquor and the grapefruit juice was clearly not fresh as it almost tasted of aluminum, but overall the cocktail was good.

xxxxxxxxxx which associate was excited to find that the establishment carried as it is their favorite and very difficult to find.

For appetizers we ordered the xxxxxxxx and the xxxxxxxxx which were both absolutely delightful!!

The xxxxxxxx were extremely tender, juicy and flavorful and the horseradish sauce had just a  tiny bite to it which was nice as it wasn’t overpowering.

The xxxx was delicate and fresh and the xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx were a beautiful presentation and an amazing flavor combination.  Thumbs up to the chef!!

When the server dropped the check he said “Tonight is industry night, and I’m sure you are in the industry, so I gave you the discount.” Smiled and walked away without verifying.  Agent noted that the discount was 25%.

During the bar evaluation associate sat down first and had brought their Heffe from the dining table setting it on the bar.  Bartender 2 walked up and threw the beer away and asked what he could get associate to drink.  Associate said that he had thrown away the last half of their beer, so bartender 2 vehemently apologized saying that he is always doing that and got him a new beer saying that it was on him.

Agent sat and asked if there was fresh grapefruit juice available to which the answer was no that they were out, so agent ordered a xxxxxxxx.  Bartender 2 prepared the cocktail with a 6 count pour placed it on the beverage napkin and said it was on him because he didn’t have fresh grapefruit.

Only managers and owners are allowed to give away free alcohol. This is an ADLLC Violation.

TITLE 4, CHAPTER 3

4-244. Unlawful acts

3. It is unlawful:  For a distiller, vintner, brewer or wholesaler knowingly to sell, dispose of or give spirituous liquor to any person other than a licensee

Agent offered to buy another guest at the bar a drink at this juncture and they ordered a xxxxxxxxx from Bartender 2.  He poured a 9 count of makers, a 4 count of Rye and then swirled the glass with an Italian sweet vermouth that he said was excellent and promised that they would love this xxxxxx.  He poured the drink from the tin into the martini glass and then dumped about 2 ounces of the mix down the drain.  He made no move to the POS.

Agent called bartender 1 over because I couldn’t get bartender 2’s attention and asked that he add some soda water to the xxxxxxxxxxx as it was made with just water and had no fizz at which time associate stated that it did look like he had only pushed one button and that he may not have known how to make a press.  Bartender 1 rolled his eyes and rudely said to associate that he knew how to make a press.  He then dumped the drink and made a fresh one, but clearly only put sprite in the glass, delivered the drink, made no move to the POS or a comp tab and walked away without a word.  Agent found him quite abrasive.

Later in the evaluation, agent, associate and the 3rd party were chatting about different liquors and specifically over 100 proof items.  We were all agreeing that in certain bars it is not a good idea to have Wild Turkey 101 and Bacardi 151 because of the way people have a tendency to become belligerent when they drink them. 

Bartender 1 jumped into the conversation saying that he totally disagreed and that he was going to prove us wrong to which agent asked how.  He proceeded to get a bottle of “Dirty Bird” he called it, from the dog pound, pour us 3 shots with a laugh and put the bottle away.  He said that he bet we wouldn’t turn into assholes at all.

Later in the evaluation agent asked bartender 1 about the men smoking at the bar to which he said, “as long as you promise to pay the entire fine, including the bar’s fine, you can do whatever you want.” 

He went on to say that they were rich guys that came in all the time and who was he to tell them no.  Agent asked “So I can light up right here if I want?” and bartender 1 replied, “I doubt you could afford it.”  As aforementioned, agent was appalled at this situation and the total disregard by the bartenders.

Throughout the evaluation, all from bartender 2, we ordered 2 more x xx beyond the initial free one, one more xxxxxxxxxxx (which was made with water again) and 4 xxxxxxxxxx for the 3 of us together at the bar. 

The 3rd party agent and associate were with paid for a round of 3 Orange Blossom Beers which was $21 + $5 tip. 

When agent asked for the tab and a bottled water from bartender 2 he said that we didn’t have a tab because he bought the 1st beer and agent’s xxxxxxxxx and that the other guest paid for the 3 more xxxxxx.  Agent said that we had had more than that plus the water and he smiled saying he did not know what I was talking about. 

Agent gave him $20 and said thank you and he put it directly in his pocket, not the tip jar, and left the bar area with a cigarette in his hand.

This means that in addition to the $22.75 discount that the server gave us for no cause of our doing we received 2 xxx beers, 1 xxxx drink, 1 xxxxx Manhattan and 1 xxxxxx for free. All this given to a complete stranger, let alone a trained bartender theft integrity spotter.

That is about $65.75 loss in sales.  Not to mention the 3 shots that we did not order, the 3 food items that were ordered wrong by bartender 2 that other guests ended up eating and the over pours, none of which agent observed being accounted for in any way.

Addendum:

Agent and associate both agreed that it appeared that bartender 2 was on some sort of stimulant drug which we both surmised to be cocaine or methamphetamine. This obviously cannot be substantiated without testing; however, this Agent strongly suspects it.

He did not blink and he bugged his eyes out when speaking, his movements were exaggerated and extremely fast yet clumsy, he spoke quite loud and fast,  he had a difficult time finishing a thought before derailing to another, he was constantly fidgeting with something including sticking his hands in the front and back of the waistband of his pants, etc.

This is an ADLLC Violation.

TITLE 4, CHAPTER 3

4-244. Unlawful acts

24. For a licensee or employee to permit the unlawful possession, use, sale or offer for sale of narcotics, dangerous drugs or marijuana on the premises.

Michael Zenner - CEO      
Eye Spy Spotter Services Inc.
eyespyspotter.com

bartheft.com  (blog)
Hospitality Checkpoint PLLC
PI Lic. 1597616
hospitalitycheckpoint.com
liquorassessment.com

PO BOX 995 Gilbert AZ 85299
Office: 480-777-7056
Toll Free: 800-880-0811

© Eye Spy Spotter Services Inc. 2011


BARTENDER THEFT: Free shots for girls. Overpouring for larger tips. Padded tab for friends.

August 13, 2011 18:04 by administrator

BARTENDER THEFT:

Bartender Summary      
  
                                                                          

  • Bartender 1 – xxxxxx xxxx with slicked back ponytail and full mustache wearing black button down with tie and black pants.
  • Bartender 2 – xxxxxxxxxxx with very short black hair and short trimmed beard wearing black button down with tie and black pants.

Agent took a seat at the bar and noted that bartender 1 was standing leaning against his drink well on the patio side of the bar and chatting with 3 female guests.  Bartender 2 had his head down and was cleaning behind the bar and at the time was dismantling what looked like a food processor and thoroughly cleaning it.

Agent sat for over 6 minutes while bartender 1 continued chatting and flirting with the ladies at the bar. 

Finally after staring at him and him making eye contact on 2 prior occasions, he finally approached and said “what would you like” with a smile.  Agent asked for a drink menu and he turned and retrieved a full size menu placing it on the bar drink side up.  Agent ordered and he filled the order right away, quoting a price and moving directly to the POS to process the payment. 

Bartender 1 immediately returned to chatting with the ladies without even glancing at the rest of the guests at the bar top to see if they needed anything.             

There was never an offer for chips and salsa or food of any sort made to agent and associate.

During the evaluation agent and associate wanted to order some food.  We had looked at the single menu we had and put it in front of us and then finally pushed it forward until it was hanging over the edge of the bar. 

Eight minutes later associate finally said excuse me to bartender 2 who was directly in front of us cleaning, and asked if we could please order some food.  Bartender 2 did not say a word to us, but instead said something to bartender 1 in Spanish who was still talking to the female guests at the bar, and then returned to his cleaning.

It was another full minute before bartenders 1 broke away from his flirting to approach and ask what we would like to order.  We put in an order for a single item, clearly planning to share and we were never offered side plates, silverware or napkins.

Bartender 1 did not request payment or a credit card to secure a tab for the food and cocktails.

The food was delivered in a timely manner by bartender 1. 

Neither bartender performed a check back after food delivery.

During the remainder of the evaluation agent observed a few questionable situations as well as mediocre service and timing issues:

8:50 - bartender 1 was observed to make 6 shots for a group of women that were standing at the end of the bar. One woman pulled out her credit card and proceeded to hand it to bartender 1, who then shook his hand as if to say "no he didn't want it." The female with the credit card leaned over the bar and gave bartender a full on contact mouth kiss as the rest of the women in the group cheered on.

9:00 – a guest approached the service well near the patio and ordered a cocktail from bartender 1.  He poured an 8 count Absolut Vodka and grapefruit juice. (4 count = 1.5 ounces) He quoted a price and moved to the POS with the cash handed to him and rang in $7.50 and returned what appeared to be correct change.  Agent is certain that the guest did not order and was not charged for a double. Delivering more alcohol than what is prescribed by management is bartender theft.

9:05 – A guest flagged down bartender 2 (bartender 1 back to flirting) who called bartender 1 over to the POS.  Together they rang in what appeared to be an additional 5 items to the tab and presented it to the guest.  This was a clear instance of extremely delayed ringing.  Agent had observed these particular guests have quite a few cocktails as well as food. When receiving and looking at the bill, the customer "high-fived" bartender 1 apparently pleased with the amount off the bill. 

9:15 – agent flagged down bartender 2 who again called over bartender 1 at which time a cocktail was ordered.  Bartender 1 prepared the cocktail with a 7 count pour (the cocktail was not ordered as a double) and delivered it moving immediately back to the ladies at the end of the bar not moving to the POS. 

During the time agent ordered the cocktail, associates drink was about 80% empty and bartenders 1 nor 2 took any notice.

9:15 to 9:35 – agent and associate had finished the food and pushed the plate forward and it was never cleared until we were closing our check out.

9:21 – bartender 1 poured an 8 count Margarita Rocks with what appeared to be well tequila.  He moved to the POS, but added the margarita to a tab, therefore agent cannot confirm if it was ordered or billed as a double.

9:22 – associates drink was 90% empty.

9:30 – associates drink was 100% empty and had been for a few minutes.  Agents drink was 80% empty.

9:32 – Associate pushed a credit card to the edge of the bar to attempt to signal some sort of service as we were still being completely ignored. 

9:35 Agent and associate flagged down the bartenders to ask for our bill which Bartender 1 then added the cocktail to that he had not accounted for and returned the check.  The cocktail was not accounted for correctly in the POS as the brand of liquor was wrong and is a typically higher priced item than what was poured. This to ois a form of bartender theft.

Throughout the evaluation agent observed bartender 2 not serving any guests and simply cleaning, stocking and doing other side work while bartender 1 ignored guests at the bar top. 

There were several occasions that guests asked bartender 2 for something and he retrieved bartender 1 for them just as he had for agent and associate.  Each of these occasions, bartender 1 would serve the guest that called him over, and go right back to the ladies without checking on any of the other bar guests.

There were also several occasions that agent observed a server approach the well to pick up a drink that had been rung in prior and bartender 1 had not noticed the ticket print and therefore not prepared the order.

There were four occasions that bartender 1 would serve a guest a new cocktail, and he would leave the old glass/bottle sitting in front of the guest for some time before clearing it although it was clearly empty.

Overall, other than the fact that both bartenders were very pleasant and friendly, agent found the level of service to be really disconcerting.  Agent and associate left the bar feeling exasperated and disregarded.

Michael Zenner - CEO      
Eye Spy Spotter Services Inc.
eyespyspotter.com

bartheft.com  (blog)
Hospitality Checkpoint PLLC
PI Lic. 1597616
hospitalitycheckpoint.com
liquorassessment.com

PO BOX 995 Gilbert AZ 85299
Office: 480-777-7056
Toll Free: 800-880-0811

© Eye Spy Spotter Services Inc. 2011


Bartender Theft - Theft occurance, Employee drug use while on duty.

February 26, 2011 18:08 by administrator

BARTENDER THEFT:

Facility Summary

The agent approached the facility from xxx Road.  It was difficult to find the establishment, despite directions, given its location facing a street interior to the shopping plaza, and the lack of signage around the perimeter.  Only after asking directions a second time was the agent able to locate the facility.

A few parking spaces are available in front of the building, while the majority of the parking is to the rear.  Large signage hangs above the rear entrance, as well as in front.

A patio along the side of the building was barren, with no seating and clearly not in use, aside from as a smokers’ haven.  One guest was observed being locked out, unable to get back in through the patio door from which she exited.  A retractable door to what appeared to be a bar was down.  An ash urn on the patio was filled with butts and trash.

The windows along the front of the facility were dirty and in need of cleaning, with cobwebs accumulated in the corners.  The sidewalk in front of the entrance had some trash, and the covered area immediately in front of the large entrance doors had trash and debris, and was very barren.  A large foot mat would serve both as an appealing aesthetic as well as to keep the area clean.

The agent was struck by the overwhelming smell of marijuana outside the entrance.  He again smelled the drug when inside the establishment; please refer to the Cocktail Summary for details.

The entrance delivers guests into a very large room with a very large bar in the middle.  High-top tables surround most areas of the bar, while a dance floor and stage are to the far right of the room, and dining tables and booths are to the far left.  A host desk is immediately in front of the entrance, and a small store for branded merchandise is around the left corner.

An enclosed corral with a mechanical bull is around the right corner from the entrance, across from the bar.  An employee manned the desk next to the bull, rides on which were apparently offered for a fee.  At no time during the visit did a DJ or MC use the microphone to announce the evening’s events, any specials, any upcoming events, or call attention to the mechanical bull.  Given the large size of the establishment and various options for entertainment, it would be useful to have such announcements.

The temperature inside the establishment was cool, particularly in the cocktail areas closest to the stage, where it was cold enough to be uncomfortable.

Televisions hang above the bar and throughout the room, with three large screens above the stage.  The screens broadcast sporting events—mostly football.  A large screen above the mechanical bull showed country music videos that did not coincide with the music playing over the audio system.  The music was at a volume appropriate for the size of the room and number of guests; however, when the band began playing, at 9:05pm, the volume was quite excessive, and it was difficult to hear someone sitting right next to you.

The table tops and floors were clean, and all furniture appeared in good condition.  The bar top was wet in areas; when asked to clean it, the bartenders left the dirty rags sitting on top of the bar.  This is an AZ Health Code Violation. Flyers for upcoming events were scattered on the bar top.

Restrooms are located along the rear wall of the facility, to the left of the rear entrance.  The facilities were large, with many stalls and sinks, and had a simple yet appealing décor.  One of the sinks in the women’s restroom was not functioning, but the remainder of the fixtures in both restrooms appeared operational.  Most stalls had paper trash littering the floor.  The restrooms were attended late in the visit by pleasant, friendly employees.

The attendant in the women’s restroom was a female of Asian descent.  She sat on a backed stool blocking the hand dryers and handed out folded paper towels.  She was pleasant and informed guests of fixtures that were broken.

 

Cocktail Summary

·       Cocktail 1:  Female, 5’6”, Caucasian, in her twenties, with a slender build, blond hair, and wide-set eyes.  The receipt she provided gave her name as Xxxxxx.

·       Cocktail 2:  Female, 5’5”, Caucasian, in her late twenties, with a slender, muscular build and dark hair worn in a long pageboy.  She was very tanned and wore a black tank top; her physique and the way in which she carried herself suggested she is an athlete.

Xxxxxx approached the agent and his associate six minutes after they were seated in the cocktail area.  She gave a quick greeting and asked if she could get them something to drink. 

She did not require identification (under 30) and did not suggest any upsell options.

Before leaving the table with the order, Xxxxxx offered a menu and asked whether the agent and his associate wanted to keep a tab with her.  She required to hold a credit card to keep the tab. 

She did not introduce herself.

Xxxxxx quickly returned with the drinks, and checked on the agent and his associate appropriately.  She was prompt in delivery of all items and visible on the floor even when not in proximity of the agent’s table.

Both cocktail servers appeared to check in with their tables in appropriate intervals.  They were also quick to clear glassware and tables after guests departed.

At one of Xxxxxx’s approach to the table, the agent and his associate were immediately overwhelmed by the smell of marijuana.  They smell did not appear to be caused by the proximity of any other person.

TITLE 4, CHAPTER 3

4-244. Unlawful acts

24. For a licensee or employee to knowingly permit the unlawful possession, use, sale or offer for sale of narcotics, dangerous drugs or marijuana on the premises.

When the agent requested his tab, Xxxxxx first confirmed he wanted it on the card, and then delivered an itemized receipt, two credit card slips, the agent’s card, and a pen, all in a check presenter that contained no promotional material.  She thanked the agent and his associate; she did not return to the table to collect the check prior to the agent and his associate departing.

The agent ordered a non-alcoholic beverage when requesting the tab as an pre-text integrity check, as such items are often omitted in such situations, either unintentionally or in hopes of garnering a larger tip.  The item was included appropriately on the tab and lending credit to this server’s integrity.

Bartender Summary

·       Bartender 1:  Female, 5’0”, Caucasian, in her twenties, with an average build and long, straight, very dark hair.  She wore jean shorts and a black tank top.  The receipt she provided at the end of the visit identified her as Xxxxxx.

·       Bartender 2:  Female, 5’4”, Caucasian, in her twenties, with an average build and short, blond hair.  She wore jean shorts and a yellow tank top tied up in the back.       

·       Bartender 3:  Male, 5’10”, Caucasian, in his twenties, with a slender yet muscular build and what appeared to be a bald or shaved head underneath a cap.  He wore jeans and a black tee shirt.

·       Bartender 4:  Female, 5’5”, Caucasian, in her twenties, with an average build and dark hair with highlights.  She chewed gum with an open mouth.

·       Bartender 5:  Male, 5’10”, Caucasian with a dark complexion, a bald or shaved head, and a very short beard.  He had a muscular build and chewed gum.  He worked the end of the bar closest to the dining area.

·       Bartender 6:  Male, 5’11”, Caucasian, in his early twenties, with a slender, muscular build, a round face, and short, dark hair.  He had many tattoos on his arms and worked the end of the bar closest to the stage.

·       Bartender 7:  Male, 5’8”, Caucasian, in his late twenties or early thirties, with a muscular build, very short, dark hair, deep-set eyes, and many tattoos.  He had a beard and a small goatee patch under his bottom lip.  He wore a black tee shirt that appeared to be an advertisement for UFC fighter xxxxxx xxx.

·       Bartender 8:  Male, 6’1”, Caucasian, in his twenties, with a blond buzz cut and a lean build.  He wore jeans and a black button-down shirt.

·       Barback:  Male, 5’6”, Caucasian, in his late teens or early twenties, with a thin build and light-brown or blond hair worn under a hat, with a little ponytail or mullet in the back.

Bartenders 1, 2, and 3 were behind the bar when the agent and his associate approached.  Bartenders 4 and 6 were behind the bar after another thirty minutes.  The remainder of the bartenders were behind the bar by midway into the visit.

The agent sat at the bar for several minutes before a bartender acknowledged him. 

Xxxxxx eventually approached with a very casual greeting, asking if she could get him and his associate something to drink.  She offered upsell options and did not require identification (one guest under 30 years).

Xxxxxx filled the round promptly and delivered it without cocktail napkins or coasters.  She asked if the agent and his associate wanted to start a tab and requested a credit card to do so. 

She appeared to ring in the round immediately; she did not place a tab in front of the agent, and did not introduce herself.  From the initial interaction, she appeared either unfriendly or uninterested.

Within several minutes, Xxxxxx returned and offered menus.  She did not make any suggestions or mention any specials.  She did not return to ask whether the agent and his associate had decided on any food for another twelve minutes.

The appetizer arrived after eight minutes.  Xxxxxx, having not provided any predrops, followed up after two minutes with plates, silverware, and napkins.

Shortly thereafter, Xxxxxx began interacting more with the agent and his associate, and proved very friendly and personable.  She inquired as to how they liked the food and went out of her way several times to try to accommodate the agent’s special request.  Please refer to the Food and Beverage Summary for details.

The bartenders were not very quick to notice the need for additional rounds, nor did they seem to habitually “sweep” the bar to check in on guests.  They spent most of their attention with several groups who appeared to be friends or maybe regulars, or talking amongst themselves.  They acted more as order takers as opposed to being pro-active about increasing sales.

Bartender 2 drank from a capped Solo cup while behind the bar.  Bartender 1 drank an unidentified brown liquid from an uncapped plastic cup behind the bar.  The bartenders also passed around a plate of nachos and kept it behind the bar, apparently to be snacked on while behind the bar.

Bartender 3 noticed the need for an additional round while passing quickly by the agent and his associate.  He filled the order quickly and did not ask for payment or a tab name, and he did not move to the register. 

The order did appear on the agent’s final tab and therefore is reported as a possible theft issue.

Bartender 2, upon offering and delivering an additional round, asked for the name on the tab and immediately updated it.

In general, the bartenders did an excellent job immediately ringing in rounds.  All bartenders were observed to demonstrate accurate cash handling.  There was no cashing in or handling of tips from the tip jar.

Bartender 4 explained the tab procedures to a bar guest, explaining the card would be authorized for twenty dollars and returned to the guest.  This differed from the observed practice, of bartenders keeping the cards behind the bar.

Bartender 1 kept lip gloss behind the bar and applied it in open site of paying customers.  The agent did not observe any other use of personal items.

The bartenders utilized a free-pour technique for cocktails, and poured according to standards. 

However, there was a great deal of waste when pouring draft beer, however, as they habitually allowed lots of foam to spill over while pouring a draft.  Given the very cold temperature of the drafts the agent and his associate were served, there did not appear to be a need for so much draft waste to bleed off foam, which, in the Agent’s experience, is a typical indicator of insufficiently-chilled beer.

The bar staff appeared attentive to service bar orders and fulfilled them according to protocols.

Barback was frequently behind the bar, delivering food orders as well as restocking glassware.  Whenever he was behind the bar, he did a sweet of the bar top, looking for empty glassware and dirty plates.  He was pleasant and friendly when asking guests if they were finished with their plates and could they be removed.  He appeared to be a hard worker.

When the agent asked to close his tab, Xxxxxx delivered an itemized check that was correct, as well as two credit card slips.  She thanked him and his associate and wished them a good night.

Throughout the visit, the agent continued to observe the bar staff from afar, and saw no evidence of theft or cash mishandling.

BARTENDER THEFT:

Michael Zenner - CEO      
Eye Spy Spotter Services Inc.
eyespyspotter.com

bartheft.com  (blog)
Hospitality Checkpoint PLLC
PI Lic. 1597616
hospitalitycheckpoint.com
liquorassessment.com

PO BOX 995 Gilbert AZ 85299
Office: 480-777-7056
Toll Free: 800-880-0811

© Eye Spy Spotter Services Inc. 2010


Bartender Theft, Delayed Rings, Free Dinks, Horrible Service.

September 9, 2010 20:26 by administrator

Bartender Summary     

  • Bartender #1 – petite Xxxxx female with blonde hair with black tips. Xxxxx was the name on the check.           
  • Bartender #2 – Xxxxx male, dark hair with arm tattoos.

Agent would like to preface this bartender section by stating that only four things were, for the most part, spoken to the Agent the entire time present at the bar:

What would you like?

Another?

Another?

Thanks. (credit card receipt without any eye contact)

That was the total of the verbal interaction between Agent and bartender. This was all with Xxxxx. Bartender #2 never ever spoke to me nor ever even gave me any eye contact whatsoever.

With that said, Agent took a seat at the bar and was greeted shortly after by Xxxxx who said, “What would you like.” Agent asked if there were any specials and was told no. Agent placed order and it was delivered shortly after without any cocktail card. Xxxxx placed the beer down, without eye contact, and walked away without any comment.

As aforementioned, the only other comments to the Agent were when the drink glass was empty; she would blurt out a simple, “nuther.” She was so incredibly distant and unfriendly that Agent couldn’t wait for this portion of the evaluation to be over. Assuredly, if not on duty, Agent would have tabbed out and left and never returned based on Xxxxx’s cold service.

Bartender #2 was present at the beginning of this evaluation period, as well as, at the end. It’s assumed he went on brake for the time in between. In sum, it doesn’t really matter as he never paid this customer any heed whatsoever when he was present anyhow.   

Neither bartender offered Agent a food menu. Neither bartender was observed to ever suggest food sales to any customers at the bar. This is a real shame with such good food to offer. Management is losing a great potential of revenue streams by this lazy bartenders’ practice of never offering anyone any food.

Some of the aforementioned statements may seem rather harsh; however, that was feeling given from these bartenders and representative of their lousy service standards. They both exuded a sense of some type of entitlement to be bartenders here and that “normal” service standards didn’t apply to them.

  • No receipt was ever placed in front of Agent or any other bar customer.
  • Tab not secured with a credit card.
  • Bartender drank iced tea from an open container behind bar.
  • Bartenders group and/or delay rings for drink orders (see bartender addendum).
  • Bartender theft/integrity issues suspected with bartender Xxxxx (see bartender addendum).
  • Bartenders lean and talk with each other, instead of guests, during down times.
  • Xxxxx actually down sold a beverage to the Agent (see addendum).
  • Tip removed by Xxxxx, from in front of Agent, before Agent departed – without comment either.
  • Agent stood and gave ample time for bartenders to say goodbye and they failed to do so.
  • Xxxxx frequently plays/twirls her fingers in her hair and doesn’t wash her hands afterwards. This is a health code issue.
  • I asked for lemon water and water was brought by Xxxxx without a lemon.
  • On at least 3 occasions both bartenders were absent from behind the bar leaving the bar basically vacated.

In sum, these bartenders made absolutely no connection with this patron.

(See Bartender Addendum in Food and Beverage Summary)

Bartender Addendum:

DO NOT POST THIS SECTION TO STAFF

SPOTTER ANONYMITY WILL BE COMPROMISED

Xxxxx never rings in drinks after making them; therefore, it was impossible to fully substantiate theft/integrity issues. Agent highly suspects it is happening, but as stated can’t back it up for the simple reason that Xxxxx never rings in drinks as she makes them. Her protocol seems to be when someone is ready to tab out she rings the drinks all together. In fact, Agent observed her at the POS system glancing around at guests as if she was taking a mental inventory of what drinks she had delivered.

Grouping orders and delaying drink rings is a very dangerous bartending habit. Even the fastest of bartenders is going to miss ringing drinks in this fashion. Moreover, it is the perfect scenario to mask bartender theft. The bartender can choose to just not ring in a round or more and no one is ever the wiser.

Here is a sample of her ringing procedures:

  • 2:15 pm – Xxxxx poured a 5-6 count (4 count = 1 ½ oz) to man at far end of bar and did not report to register. Then immediately after poured 2 draft beers for 2 other patrons and did not register those drinks either.
  • 2:30 pm – Xxxxx poured Agent an alcohol drink with a weak 3 count and also did not record the drink on the POS.
  • 2:38 pm – Xxxxx delivered a draft beer and did not report to the POS.
  • 2:44 pm – Xxxxx delivered a beer and a screwdriver to 2 new guests at the bar. She reported immediately to the register to record the drinks. The difference here was that the man apparently handed Xxxxx a credit card without prompting and this is why she recorded the drinks right away.
  • 2:50 pm – Xxxxx delivered a cocktail to same man at end of bar with a 5-6 count of alcohol and did not record the transaction.
  • 2:53 pm - Xxxxx poured Agent an alcohol drink with a weak 3 count and also did not record the drink on the POS.
  • 2:44 pm – Xxxxx delivered a bottle of beer to the men seated at the end of the bar and did not record the it on the POS.
  • 2:54 pm – Agent tabbed out and it appeared that Xxxxx rang all the drinks at once.
  • There were more no ring transactions but too many to timely record.

As aforementioned, there were 2 men at the end of the bar. Both bartenders knew them well. In fact, the majority of Xxxxx’s down time was in front of them talking. Agent did not observe Xxxxx ring in any of their drinks ever during the period that Agent was present. Moreover, these men were privileged to nearly double the amount of poured alcohol in their drinks. They could have been double drinks but Agent doubts that scenario, but can’t substantiate it because she never rang in the drinks. Agent suspects they were given extra long alcohol pours to increase Xxxxx’s tip amount and/or bartending social status.

In order to have some sort of rapport with bartender Xxxxx, Agent asked her what was the Xxxx liquor dispenser. Xxxxx simply said, “It’s orange flavored, like

Jager, but it’s not any good.” Then she walked away without further comment or asking if I wanted one. A real down-sell, as well as, a failed attempt at conversation.

Agent highly suggests that management address the bartenders’ ringing procedures. It is recommended that bartenders be instructed to ring drinks into the POS immediately after they are made – no exceptions. Not ringing drinks should be considered a theft occurrence. In addition, Agent would recommend that bartenders place an updated receipt in front of each guest after each drink order is made. With that in place, if a bartender fails to replace a receipt after a drink order, than management will know that drinks are being given away.

BARTENDER THEFT:

Michael Zenner - CEO      
Eye Spy Spotter Services Inc.
eyespyspotter.com

bartheft.com  (blog)
Hospitality Checkpoint PLLC
PI Lic. 1597616
hospitalitycheckpoint.com
liquorassessment.com

PO BOX 995 Gilbert AZ 85299
Office: 480-777-7056
Toll Free: 800-880-0811

© Eye Spy Spotter Services Inc. 2010


BARTENDER THEFT: Horrible Service, Alcohol Theft, Bad Controls, Poorly Run Restaurant

March 5, 2010 01:48 by administrator
BARTENDER THEFT: Horrible Service, Alcohol Theft, Bad Controls, Poorly Run Restaurant

A long time client of ours was propositioned to become a partial owner of another establishment. He wanted my staff to go in and check how the operation was being run so that he could get a third party judgment view of the restaurant. The spotter’s report (truncated as many parts needed to be removed for privacy reasons) was rather stunning at how horribly this establishment is being run.

Bartender Summary

  • Bartender: Xxxxx female with long curly blond hair. She wore a black shirt with blue jeans. She was audibly identified as Xxxxx by servers.

The agent was seated at the bar and greeted by the bartender approx 2 minutes later. The bartender was friendly, but not overtly courteous or positive. She did not smile often, and she did not interact with patrons in a friendly or positive way.

The bartender’s pours were consistently accurate. She poured a steady 4 count (4 count = 1 ½ oz) for cocktails and seemed to use correct recipes.

All of the drinks she served included correct garnishments, and straws. She was not consistent with using cocktail napkins at the bar. She would place drinks directly onto the bar top.

Bar tabs were kept on paper tickets that the bartender would stick onto the metal freezer with a magnet. The bartender would mark tabs on the refrigerator. The agent did not see any supplemental accountability measures in place to ensure that the drinks were being marked on the tab. In other words, the agent feels that there is no way to know if the bartender was, in fact, was ringing in all the drinks served.

The agent also found that the bartender was accepting many server call outs. Servers were generally be at a table near the kitchen area and call out to the bartender to get a drink for them. The bartender would give the drink to them over the bar and take no money from the server in exchange for the drink. The agent also found this very troubling since there is no way to know if the server was charging for the drinks or not.

The bartender would frequently leave from behind the bar for extended periods of time. The bartender would disappear leaving the servers and patrons at the bar to literally fend for themselves. The agent observed servers go behind the bar on numerous occasions getting bottled beer. The agent did not see any server pour their own cocktail, but did help themselves to bottled beer. Needless to say, this is very troubling and opens the door wide open to potential abuses by servers.

Finally, the agent found the bartender eating a meal while on duty behind the bar. She stood in the middle of the bar area next to a table that held a plate with some pasta on it. She stood eating and then would serve drinks while she ate without washing her hands. This is an Arizona Health Code Violation. The agent found it unprofessional for an employee to be eating while on duty, especially while at their post.      

Wait Staff Summary

  • Server: Xxxxx female with long brown hair and a slender physique. She identified herself as Xxxxx.

The agent was seated and almost immediately approached by the server. Xxxxx carried herself with a positive demeanor and was friendly when talking with patrons. She asked for a drink order and wrote it on a pad. She then went over to the poker tables and took numerous orders from the poker players as well. She then went to the kitchen area and started to sort her orders on her tray. She used separate papers to write the orders on, so by the end of her round she had a stack of papers to go through. She took a few minutes to sort herself out, and then started to input the kitchen orders and (surprisingly) went behind the bar to start getting her own beers. She served the poker players drinks, but did not establish a form of payment. She did not collect cash or credit cards while she served drinks. The agent does not know which system she was using to ensure the right drinks were put on the right tabs, especially for the poker players.

Unlike many of the poker player’s drinks, the agent’s drink order took a very long time. The agent’s drink order was taken at 7:35, but were not delivered until 7:50. The agent believes a 15 minute wait time is far too much for a simple drink order.

Xxxxx seemed knowledgeable about the items on the menu. She did not offer appetizers or make any suggestions to the agent. She made several returns to the agent to ask if the agent was ready to order food, but did not think it important to ask to start with an appetizer or to make a suggestion to help facilitate the decision.

Xxxxx doubled as the server for tables and the poker room. The agent believes that Xxxxx found it difficult to handle the work load. She seemed constantly flustered and rushed. She frequently forgot drink orders, and took a very long time to bring drinks and food to be brought out to the table.

She even forgot silverware from time to time. The agent overheard one patron very upset that he was served a steak without silverware to eat it with. Then when he requested silverware, he wasn’t brought knife to cut the steak with.

The agent believes having more than one server to service the poker area would have been prudent. There was another server on hand, but she seemed to only focus on a section of tables. There was definitely a need for more help in the poker area for more efficient service.

The dining area was always in need of some pick ups. There were a lot of empty bottles, and used glassware all over the poker area that needed to be retrieved. The floors also needed to be spot swept and clean up from time to time. Trash built up on the ground, especially under the tables, during the evaluation period.

The agent’s food order took 20 minutes to be brought out to the table. When it was finally brought out, there was no side items brought along with it. The agent requested side items, and received them several minutes later.

The food presentation needed work as well. The presentation looked boring, and mostly thrown together.

When the agent was ready to cash out the tab, Xxxxx asked the agent for a credit card without giving an itemized tab or a total first. The agent received a credit card transaction receipt but no itemized receipt. Agent finds this very disconcerting and a loop-hole for theft opportunity.

Management Summary

The manager on duty was Xxxxx, the owner of the establishment. He was observed to be imbibing beverages at the bar. He was very visibly intoxicated. At one point, the agent observed him pushing kamakazi shots to the poker players. He was also talking to patrons quite often and being very friendly.

The manger did approach the agent at one point and ask how the experience was going. He was friendly and nice.

He did seem somewhat helpful to staff, however it would have been a big help to bus tables and pick up the trash in the poker area.     

 

Michael Zenner - CEO  
         

Eye Spy Spotter Services Inc.
eyespyspotter.com

bartheft.com  (blog)
Hospitality Checkpoint PLLC
PI Lic. 1597616
hospitalitycheckpoint.com
liquorassessment.com

PO BOX 995 Gilbert AZ 85299
Office: 480-777-7056
Toll Free: 800-880-0811

© Eye Spy Spotter Services Inc. 2010


BARTENDER THEFT: Gave Free Drink to the Liquor Agent, Bar Theft, Bad Service, and Liquor Liability Issues.

March 5, 2010 01:17 by administrator

BARTENDER THEFT: Gave Free Drink to the Liquor Agent, Bar Theft, Bad Service, and Liquor Liability Issues.

Bartender Summary:

  • Xxxxx:  Xxxxx male with dark brown spiked hair.  He wore the xxxxx male bartender xxx.

The agent and associate found an open spot at the bar and sat down.  Xxxxx quickly approached us and gave us a greeting.  He offered us a drink and the agent and associate each ordered a beverage.  Xxxxx did not ask for ID before preparing and delivering the beverages.  Upon delivery of the beverages, Xxxxx asked whether we wanted to order food.  The agent declined, and Xxxxx politely introduced himself and told us to let him know if we needed anything else.  He entered our order into the POS, but did not quote a price or ask for a credit card to hold the tab.

The bar was relatively slow during the period of this observation, and Xxxxx appeared to be very lax as a result.  He spent a fair amount of time eating food at a corner table of the room.  During these breaks, he would generally have the MOD stand in for him at the bar.  Furthermore, there was one female, Xxxxx with brown hair and glasses, who appeared to be an employee but was not in uniform, and was going behind the bar to give Xxxxx hugs and joke around with him.  She was also observed standing at the end of the bar eating food.

Xxxxx was somewhat inconsistent in his approach to using the POS.  On most occasions he would enter orders into the POS immediately; however, the agent observed two occasions in which he did not do so. 

  • At approximately 9:22pm, Xxxxx was observed serving a beverage to a customer without entering anything into the POS. 
  • Furthermore, for the agent’s final round, Xxxxx did not enter the beverage into the POS. 

Although this was only two occasions during the observation, it represented a significant percentage of observed transactions given the volume of business.  This style of bartending can easily lead to mistakes and/or the giving away of free beverages.  Ultimately, the agent’s rogue beverage never made it onto the final itemized bill. If the bartender is delivering free drinks to a bar theft detection Agent, then management can interpolate there are some serious integrity issues present.

The agent was also concerned with Xxxxx’s adherence to liquor laws.  Xxxxx was not observed checking any customers for identification, the agent and associate included.  Furthermore, Xxxxx appeared to be indifferent about the level of intoxication of his customers.  The agent observed two individuals that were visibly intoxicated during the evaluation. 

Xxxxx continued to deliver beers to the customers, even after they began exhibiting signs of intoxication.  The agent observed one of the men dropping his phone as he tried to complete a call.  When he was finally able to complete the call, the content of his conversation was overheard and focused on how him and his friend were heavily drunk and that they needed whomever to come pick them up.

AZ TITLE 4, CHAPTER 3
4-244. Unlawful acts

14. For a licensee or other person to serve, sell or furnish spirituous liquor to a disorderly or obviously intoxicated person, or for a licensee or employee of the licensee to allow or permit a disorderly or obviously intoxicated person to come into or remain on or about the premises, except that a licensee or an employee of the licensee may allow an obviously intoxicated person to remain on the premises for a period of time of not to exceed thirty minutes after the state of obvious intoxication is known or should be known to the licensee in order that a nonintoxicated person may transport the obviously intoxicated person from the premises. For purposes of this section, "obviously intoxicated" means inebriated to the extent that a person's physical faculties are substantially impaired and the impairment is shown by significantly uncoordinated physical action or significant physical dysfunction that would have been obvious to a reasonable person.

At approximately 9:48 pm, the agent observed Xxxxx pouring about a 5 count of Bushmills into a highball glass.  As he balanced the beverage with cola, he added a short additional tail of Bushmills for good 6+ count measure and delivered it to a customer (4 count = 1 ½ oz).

Overall, Xxxxx’s bartending was very lax and inconsistent.  He did not appear to be taking the job very seriously, and his ambivalence was evident in his pouring style, irresponsible liquor service, and diligence about recording orders into the POS system.  The result was heavily intoxicated customers and an incorrectly itemized bill.    

Michael Zenner - CEO  
         

Eye Spy Spotter Services Inc.
eyespyspotter.com

bartheft.com  (blog)
Hospitality Checkpoint PLLC
PI Lic. 1597616
hospitalitycheckpoint.com
liquorassessment.com

PO BOX 995 Gilbert AZ 85299
Office: 480-777-7056
Toll Free: 800-880-0811

© Eye Spy Spotter Services Inc. 2010


Bartender Theft, Really Bad Service, Free Drinks to Garner Larger Tips

January 29, 2010 23:02 by administrator

Bartender Summary                                                                                      

  • Bartender 1: A Xxxxx Xxxxx in her late Xxx, x’xx”, with an average build. She had xxx hair with xxxx worn in a xxxxx. She wore xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xx. The agent’s receipt stated her name to be Xxxxx.

At the time when the agent entered the bar there were plenty of seats available. He found a seat at the bar and began waiting for service. At the time that the agent entered, Xxxxx was taking a take-out order from a guest at the bar. It appeared that she was very unfamiliar with the POS system as this took a very long time. Also during this time four more guests entered the bar, two at a booth and two more at the bar itself.

Instead of acknowledging any of the guests who had just entered Xxxxx chose to make drinks for tickets that had printed out. At this time the bartender was visibly flustered between making drinks and serving guests. After waiting over five minutes with no eye contact the agent was finally acknowledged by Xxxxx. Management should instruct Xxxxx acknowledge new customers and in the very least, give them some sort of eye contact. A 1.5 second eye contact and simple nod tells the customer that they know that the employee knows they are there and will get to them. Being outright ignored while the bartender fields drink tickets is borderline maddening.

Xxxxx asked what the agent would like to drink and for identification after the agent stated his order. Xxxxx quickly presented the drink with a beverage napkin and moved on to the other guests.

She did not offer chips/salsa or a menu.

Xxxxx repeated this pattern of service with the other patrons in the bar. She was sure to enter each drink into the POS as she made it. This slowed her down considerable due to her unfamiliarity with the system. After getting drinks for the patrons in the bar Xxxxx left the bar area.

Throughout the agent’s visit Xxxxx would leave the bar unattended for long extended periods of time. On two instances she returned with take-out orders, but even then the agent felt the large amount of time spent away from the bar was unjustified. Most of the times Xxxxx left the bar there were guests that needed drinks or refills.

Towards the end of the agent’s visit he sat with an empty drink for almost ten minutes while the bartender said she was, “Going to get a Coke.”

After almost ten minutes of sitting without any further acknowledgement the agent took it upon himself to ask for a menu. Xxxxx provided the menu promptly and at this point also realized she had failed to offer anybody chips and salsa. She quickly beckoned another employee named Xxxxx and stated that she needed chips and salsa for everybody in the bar. Once again, nearly ten minutes after the agent had seated himself.

Soon thereafter chips and salsa were provided to the agent and each other guest in the bar. Unfortunately the chips and salsa were not accompanied with napkins or silverware of any sort.

The agent decided which item from the menu he wanted and closed his menu as a non-verbal gesture that he was ready to order.  He made eye contact with Xxxxx several times hoping she would come over and take the agent’s order; she did not. The agent waited another ten minutes while the bartender left from behind the bar and chatted with other employees about personal matters in a loud manner.

Once again, the agent took it upon himself to ask if he could order some food. The bartender then moved to the POS and turned back to the agent waiting for his order, rather than coming to the agent to have a more personal approach. That was an astonishing breech of service etiquette…I couldn’t believe it actually was happened. The agent ordered his meal, which it appeared Xxxxx did not how to find in the POS system. Another employee was present at the well, whom Xxxxx asked where to find the dish.

Xxxxx did not offer any up-sells or suggest an appetizer. She in fact closed the window before asking if the agent wanted to order anything else; he did, which he then communicated to her and she returned to the POS to input it.

The agent overheard Xxxxx speaking with another patron in the bar explaining her history with the establishment. She mentioned that she had worked there 12 years before and had just recently returned. The agent took this conversation as an explanation as to why she was unfamiliar with the POS and as to why she was so easily flustered.

The agent’s dish was delivered shortly thereafter by his bartender. She had yet to drop off napkins and silverware but quickly did so thereafter. Xxxxx asked the agent if he needed anything.

The agent requested a side item for the meal at this time. She never ever, brought it out.

There was no check-back performed during the meal.

The agent’s drink level ran low for the majority of his visit. He would have been inclined to have more drinks than he did but quite frankly, he did not have that much time to spare in between beverages.

Eventually the agent was able to order another beverage after he asked the bartender for one. Xxxxx asked if the agent would like a lime wedge with his drink. The agent was forced to decline to the fact that he had previously seen Xxxxx handle the fruit garnishes with her bare hands, and prior to that had seen her cough directly into her hands several times without washing them (AZ Health Code Violation). Not only is this a health code violation, but it’s really gross. If Agent was not on duty, most certainly would have tabbed out, left, and never returned to this establishment.

At the conclusion of the agent’s meal his dishes as many others at the bar sat unbussed for some time.

When Xxxxx finally removed the dishes she offered the agent dessert or additional drinks. The agent declined the dessert offer but mentioned that he may stay to have more drinks.

At this time the agent could have actually used another drink, unfortunately this was the time Xxxxx departed to get a Coke as previously mentioned. Once she returned the agent had been holding an empty drink for quite some time. Even then Xxxxx did not immediately offer another beverage.

The agent had an itemized receipt placed in front of him throughout his visit. Xxxxx would update this receipt with each new item the agent ordered. The agent reviewed his tab before presenting payment. He then presented payment in form of a credit card which sat on the bar top for five minutes before it was processed.

Xxxxx grabbed the card and the agent’s itemized tab. She then took the itemized receipt and threw it into the trash and ran the credit card. She returned the credit card with two copies of the receipt. Oddly though, the total the agent was charged was significantly lower than what it should have been.

The agent suspects Xxxxx removed all drinks from the tab in an effort to garner a higher tip. Theft Occurrence here is highly suspected; however, the agent was not able to question the total due to Xxxxx once again not being available.

Michael Zenner - CEO  
         

Eye Spy Spotter Services Inc.
eyespyspotter.com

bartheft.com  (blog)
Hospitality Checkpoint PLLC
Lic. 1597616
hospitalitycheckpoint.com
liquorassessment.com

PO BOX 995 Gilbert AZ 85299
Office: 480-777-7056
Mobile: 602-622-0875
Toll Free: 800-880-0811

© Eye Spy Spotter Services Inc. 2010


Bartender Theft, Not Ringing in Drinks, Free Drinks for Friends

January 11, 2010 22:27 by administrator

Bartender Summary

  1. Bartender 1:  Female, 5’5”, Caucasian, in her early twenties, with a medium build and dark hair worn in pigtails.  She wore black pants, a black tee shirt with an establishment advertisement on it, and no nametag.
  2. Bartender 2:  Female, 5’4”, Caucasian, in her early twenties, with an average build and long, straight blond hair with bangs.  She also wore black pants and a black promotional tee shirt, as well as a nametag identifying her as Xxxxxx.

 

Bartender 1 approached the agent and his associate very soon after they approached the bar.  She immediately placed beverage napkins on the bar top and offered drinks. 

She did not suggest upsell options, but did mention the feature drink for the month.

Bartender 1 did not require identification.  Both the agent and his associate appear less than forty years of age, and the agent is frequently assumed less than thirty.

Bartender 1 filled and delivered the round promptly.  She did not ask for payment or to secure a tab, but did ring in the round promptly.

Several minutes later, Bartender 1 returned and offered menus.  She mentioned the nightly food special and informed the agent and his associate of a drink special that would be offered later in the night.

Bartender 1 returned in appropriate time to take the agent’s order.  She offered no upsell options, nor did she suggest any additional items.  She promptly rang in the order and provided a paper basket with napkins and silverware rolls.

Throughout the visit, prior to the allotted time of the drink special, Bartender 1 frequently advised patrons both seated at the bar as well as walking-up of the drink specials later in the night.

Xxxxxx delivered the appetizer in appropriate time.  Two minutes later, a food runner delivered the entrees.

Bartender 1 checked on the agent and his associate after several minutes.  She continued to check on them several times throughout the meal, and removed their service items when it was appropriate.  She offered carry-out boxes and did not suggest dessert.

Both bartenders offered additional rounds at the appropriate times; however, Bartender 1 showed the agent and his associate far more attention and pleasantness than did Xxxxxx.  When Xxxxxx did pass by and interact with the agent and his associate, she did so with a blank expression or a scowl.  She did not smile nor did she appear friendly.

Both bartenders typically utilized proper free-pour technique, delivering the requisite 1 ¼-ounce single-liquor shot.  Excessive pours appeared a result of a lack of attention, rather than intentional.

The bartenders showed no habit of immediately moving to the register to ring in rounds, particularly when the guest volume increased.  When business was slower, they moseyed to the register and lazily input rounds after they were served. 

It is during busier times, however, when the practice of immediately rings is particularly important, as a bartender can easily forget rounds when grouping.  Additionally, in the agent’s experience, bartenders with a penchant for theft always make sure to ring in rounds immediately when business is slow, because any omission would be conspicuous.  Thinking that heavier business masks their transgressions, instead, it shows the agent their true colors.

  • At 7:53pm, Bartender 1 prepared a White Russian using Three Olives Root Beer vodka for a patron; she did not ring in the item.
  • At 8:11pm, Bartender 1 served a round of beers to three male patrons sitting at the right end of the bar; said patrons appeared of questionable drinking age, and to be regular guests.  Bartender 1 did not ring in the round.
  • At 9:20pm, Bartender 1 prepared a clear vodka drink for a male patron at the left end of the bar.  She delivered the drink with no straw and did not ring it in.

Bartender 1 occasionally scooped ice using glassware—a dangerous practice that is a liability issue for the establishment, as well as an AZ health code violation. .

Both bartenders drank from cups with lids when behind the bar.  They typically did so while standing at the far right side of the bar, halfway obscured by a partial wall.  They did not eat when behind the bar, or utilize cell phone or any personal items.

The bartenders allowed a server wearing the nametag Emily to prepare several drinks behind the bar.

When the agent and his associate requested their tab, Xxxxxx accepted their card with neither a word nor a smile.  She immediately processed the payment and neither required identification—as instructed by the agent’s card—nor provided an itemized receipt.  She also returned the tab without a word.

Bartender 1 called goodbye to the agent and his associate when they departed, wishing them a good night.

The agent and his associate found Bartender 1 pleasant, but Xxxxxx rude.  She was perfectly willing to lean on the bar top, chatting lazily with guests who were regulars, but she could not be bothered to offer so much as a smile to guests she did not know.

Michael Zenner - CEO  
         

Eye Spy Spotter Services Inc.
eyespyspotter.com

bartheft.com  (blog)
Hospitality Checkpoint PLLC
Lic. 1597616
hospitalitycheckpoint.com
liquorassessment.com

PO BOX 995 Gilbert AZ 85299
Office: 480-777-7056
Mobile: 602-622-0875
Toll Free: 800-880-0811